May 10, 2022
Have you interviewed somebody who wanted to review your copy before publication? This is a surprisingly high-tension issue for many journalists, even thought it seems like it could be nipped in the bud with a simple, “Sorry, that’s against the publication’s policy.”
Today we cover:
- A simple method to reduce the number of times sources ask to review the copy
- Why they or you get so hot under the collar with a seemingly benign request
- How to use this conflict to build trust and better communications
- How to verify their statements without sharing the draft
- If and when to make an exception
🔗 Mentioned in this episode:
WCP1 What’s your [writing] problem?
WCP2 Thinking thoughts and feeling feels
🎁 Download my free guide on how to pitch freelance article ideas, “5 Proven Steps to Writing Queries that Sell.”
www.rebeccalweber.com/howtopitch
⭐ The best way to support the Writing Coach Podcast is to leave a review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts.
🎧 Listen and subscribe in your favorite podcast app.
✏️ Work with me in Freelance Writer Bootcamp
Break into your dream publications and get paid well while covering stories that matter. Alumni of my group coaching program have used the proven Bootcamp processes to break into the New York Times, the Guardian, Bustle, Fodor’s, Ms., Nat Geo Travel, Al Jazeera, the BBC, and many more.
Join the waitlist and you’ll be the first to hear when applications open, plus get access to an early bird bonus: www.FreelanceWriterBootcamp.com
🔥 Work with me 1:1
Private coaching is for the writer who wants a personalized agenda and transformative breakthroughs. You’ll experience new clarity about what’s been holding you back and choose new patterns of thinking and behavior to propel you forward toward your writing goals.
Apply for private writer coaching: www.rebeccalweber.com/coach
📝 More info and complete show notes: www.rebeccalweber.com/podcast178